Sum - Daily kWhr | Years | |||
Date | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | Total Result |
Jan | 169.7 | 255.8 | 425.5 | |
Feb | 275.0 | 322.5 | 597.5 | |
Mar | 560.8 | 560.8 | ||
Apr | 492.9 | 492.9 | ||
May | 534.3 | 534.3 | ||
Jun | 707.2 | 707.2 | ||
Jul | 769.0 | 769.0 | ||
Aug | 164.0 | 658.5 | 822.5 | |
Sep | 438.0 | 528.0 | 966.0 | |
Oct | 450.0 | 391.1 | 841.1 | |
Nov | 355.4 | 316.3 | 671.7 | |
Dec | 78.2 | 219.8 | 298.1 | |
Total Result | 1485.6 | 5622.7 | 578.4 | 7686.7 |
The system didn't get connected until 25 August, so ignoring that we can see that most months are better than the year before, other than Oct and Nov 2011. We had a "dark" fall, but otherwise, I see it is all going well.
As you may read in this blog, I focus on the numbers, kW, dollars, and cents of our solar system. I am interested in these results today as it shows that you can't use a single year to determine if production data. Or any coefficients either. In an earlier posting I calculated the typical coefficients people use to estimate the power generation for our first year. I look forward to calculating this year's coefficients, plus to calculate the values for the duration of the system - that way we'll get the general values to expect for a multi-year estimation of coefficients.
So far, so good.
Oh, a little note about how I analyse these data. I use OpenOffice Calc to store and analyse the data. I use the Data Pilot tool [Pivot Tables in Excel] to summarize the data very quickly and easily.
No comments:
Post a Comment