13 February 2011

Thermal energy good for solar panels in winter

Snow on solar panels is worth a review in our climate because of our long winter, cold days and nights, lots of snow fall, and often cloudy days. I've collected the power data daily with the Fronius datalogger on my system. I really like the datalogger but if someone asked me "should I get one", I'd say it depends. Once the panels are on your roof you are not going to change anything quite likely. I get it simply as a way to better understand the nature of PV generation in our climate and for my curiosity factor. I also wanted to establish data on a system for sharing.
The impact of snow on solar panels is very significant on total production. That is production by the individual panels as well as the "string". [I have 20 panels that are 245 watts each. My inverter model 5100 can take up to 3 series of panels, called strings. There are 2 strings going into the inverter, each with 10 panels]. Here is is a little experiment I observed about solar heat and panels in the winter:
  • snow covers the panels as the snow either falls directly on the panels or as snow in the wind drifts over the house and lands on the roof and panels
  • snow and ice will melt during direct sunshine when the temperature is below 0 degrees C
  • snow and ice won't melt during cloud cover and overcast days when the temperature is only a few degrees below 0C - just not enough heat coming through the clouds
  • very cloudy days and snow covered panels produces virtually no energy [meaning, 0.05 kWhr per day]
So, just how much do we like the bright, direct sunshine during the winter when there is snow on the panels? LOTS! I observed my indoor/outdoor min/max thermometer and grabbed my infrared thermometer. [Of course, it is not a thermometer, it would be a thermal radiometer to be exact]. I happened to have a convenient solar thermal radiation absorber - a glass mirror with the dark backing facing outside that was propped up on our window sill. The sun shone fully on this dark backing and it served as an example of how much heat is in the sunshine. I had the indoor and outdoor temperatures in the thermometer. And I used the IR thermometer to measure the solar panel temperatures [approximate].
I photographed the temperatures at 10am on 9/01/2011 - a bright winter day. Our panels and window face south east so the sun was nearly straight on the panels. You can see in the photo below the outside temperature was -6C and indoor temperature was 20C.
Photo 1. Indoor and outdoor temperatures on 9/01/2011.
I tried to measure the temperature of the solar panels. This requires an adventurous climb out a window and onto a lower roof below the panels. I used the infrared thermometer to measure the panel surface temperature. I am not sure what the actual temperature is - the glass could be reflecting heat, the cold sky temperature could be reflecting off the panels and into the thermometer, and the emissivity of the panels is not know. [The IR thermometer is set at assumed 95% emissivity of the object]. Anyways, the thermometer was between -3 and -4C. About a 2-3C temperature increase above ambient. I should do the same measurement on a cloudy day. Note that the roof is snow covered. The snow has melted and slid off the most of the panel area and to a lesser extent off the shingled roof yet.
Photo 2. Panel surface temperature estimated to be -3C, ambient is -6C.
The second panel photo [photo 3.] shows several things. First there is still snow on the panels, but it is along the top and bottom edges. The snow slides and stops at the bottom of the panel on the aluminum edge. An ice dam forms and bunches up at the junction of the top and bottom panel edges. Second thing to note is the icicles forming at the lower edge of the panels. Clearly snow and ice has melted and dripped down the panel where it freezes in the colder ambient air. The panels must be above 0C and the outside air below 0C. Third thing to notice is the water drops and what appears to be melting snow. Even though the IR thermometer is measuring -4C, the panel surface must be a little warmer for the water drops and melting snow to exist.
Photo 3. IR thermometer measurement solar panel reading -4C while outdoor temperature is -6C. Note icicles, water droplets, melting snow, and snow remaining at upper and lower edges of panels.
Finally, the thermal IR thermometer measured 51C on the reverse side of a mirror that was facing the sun in the south facing room. The surface is darker and has a low reflectivity and high absorption of solar visible and thermal radiation. This surface had no wind and cold outdoor ambient air to keep it cool. This shows the tremendous heat coming from the sun that can potentially be warming the panels. However, if this mirror surface was covered in highly reflective/low transmission thin material its surface temperature would be close to room temperature. The same holds for the solar panels that are covered with snow. The snow reflects most of the light and heat away from the panels. The snow starts to melt slowly from the bottom of the panels or where the snow very thin. Once a section of the panels are exposed to direct sunshine, that area starts to warm up. The melting front advances upwards and more panel is exposed.
As the panel warms and warm air starts to flow up under the panels snow can start to slide down the panels. I will post some pictures of snow that has accumulated on the ground show that snow clearly slides off in fairly large sheets.
Photo 4. IR thermometer measurement of back side of mirror that was facing outside on indoor window ledge. The surface temperature reads 51C while room temperature is 20C.
There are some interesting observations about snow and panels. I have not tested these observations so I could be misinterpreting things:
  • be aware of snow sliding off panels on sunny days - people and property may be hit with falling sheets of snow and ice
  • the panels certainly warm up in the direct sunshine by at least 3C and I expect even higher - wind speed can reduce their heating rate
  • ice and snow can slide down the panels and refreeze, often at the bottom edge of the panel at the aluminum trim
  • diffuse sunlight does not significantly increase the solar panel surface and snow can remain on the panels for many days
  • the low winter sun does not provide a long period for the panel and air to warm up during a sunny day - several sunny days may be required to clear the panels particularly if the air is cold and it is windy
I contacted several solar companies to ask about their systems and to get quotes. Nearly all of them were promoting the Enphase micro inverter. I have a string inverter and I don't have a similar system as mine to do any comparisons. However, the micro inverter was encouraged since they generate power from the panels individually. They are not subject to one shaded panel in a string bringing down the power generation. However, from my observations of snow on panels to date [1/2 winter] I normally have all the panels with at least some snow on them. Seldom, or for only a short duration, is one or more panels fully clear and others partly covered. This suggests to me that individual panels would also be experiencing shading and therefore reduced generation. Further study of snow on panels in Ontario, and in different installation configurations, is required before the argument can be made that micro inverters will have significant benefits over string inverters because of snow shading. My observations to days would suggest that solar developers should not over promote micro inverters solely due to increased generation during the winter - this may not have much merit and may only be suggesting the solar developers' lack of knowledge and experience.
Finally, a very rough approximation is that when the panels are half covered with snow, power generation is approximately one quarter of clear panel generation.

06 January 2011

7 Dec 2010 Snow on Panels

Snow does fall and stick to solar PV panels! Contrary to what solar salesmen say, it doesn't "just slide off", nor do the panels generate enough heat to melt the snow all the time. The sun must be bright and providing significant direct radiated heat onto the panel surface for snow to melt. This should come as now supprise when you think about it, but it is not the same message an aspiring solar system owner hears from the solar sales people. Quite often they may not have experienced seeing their systems installed long enough to provide an accurate picture of snow duration on panels.
What I found was:
- the panels are largely the same temperature as ambient under heavy overcast conditions
- snow drifts and remains on panels much like it did on the roof prior to panels
- snow will not slide off unless the panel surface is above freezing temperature.
- partial snow coverage (see photo) significantly decreases power generation, not much above generation of full snow coverage
- power generation may not be a substantial less during snow-covered days as production can be very low during heavy overcast days
Now that December 2010 is over I shall publish the month's results and my observations.
Posted by Picasa

14 December 2010

Solar system estimated output using RETScreen.net

RETScreen.net was used to estimate the amount of radiation received on the solar panels to estimate the yield we could expect for our systems. Here are the main input parameters:

  • 4.9 kW of panels [20 panels that are 245 Solarworld panels
  • 135 deg azimuth
  • 40 deg slope on panels
  • Guelph
  •  5.0 kW inverter
The revenue would be the total annual 6.140 MWhrs at $802. Using 3.5% interest rate and a 10 year loan the system has a calculated simple payback of 6.9 years. Net revenue after 10 years is $9,000 and after 20 years is $55,000.
Month
Daily solar radiation - horizontal
Daily solar radiation - tilted
Electricity export rate
Electricity exported to grid

kWh/m²/d
kWh/m²/d
$/MWh
MWh
January
1.67
2.74
802.0
0.375
February
2.84
4.13
802.0
0.505
March
3.70
4.40
802.0
0.584
April
4.53
4.64
802.0
0.580
May
5.63
5.30
802.0
0.667
June
6.31
5.74
802.0
0.682
July
6.13
5.66
802.0
0.687
August
5.28
5.24
802.0
0.637
September
3.88
4.24
802.0
0.509
October
2.59
3.24
802.0
0.415
November
1.36
1.81
802.0
0.234
December
1.25
1.94
802.0
0.264
Annual
3.77
4.09
802.00
6.140

I shall be comparing this with PVWatts in the coming days.

10 December 2010

Production summary - daily from 25 Sept 2010 to 10 Dec 2010

There is considerable variability of daily power production. The following chart shows the daily revenue [at $0.802/kWhr]. The chart points are the daily values, the solid horizontal line is the daily revenue required to break even on the 10 year loan payment. Generally the system has been earning more than it has cost, though the time frame has been too short to give a proper assessment. Note the last couple of days in November are clustered around $1. This was caused by several days of continuous full or partial snow cover. This chart will be updated approximately monthly.

Production summary - monthly from 25 Sept 2010 to 10 Dec 2010

This is a summary of the generation from our system from 25 Sept to 09 Dec. I shall be comparing these stats with RETScreen.net and posting that info in the coming days. October was our best month, the last few days in November were very dark, cloudy, and several days with snow cover on the panels. The first 9 days saw several days with partial snow cover on the panels. At this rate the panels would yield approximately $150 in Dec. [we need $332 to break even].
Monthly Stats    kWhr    Rev
2010-08    141    $113.08
2010-09    450    $360.90
2010-10    457    $366.51
2010-11    355    $285.01
2010-12-09    62    $49.45

01 December 2010

Enphase micro-inverter projects

Micro-inverters are an alternative to string inverters. Inverters convert the DC power from the panels to AC. A micro-inverter is wired to one panel, so you have as many inverters as panels. A string inverter has all the panels wired to it - only one inverter is converting the DC to AC power. Everyone has an opinion on which is better, especially sales people. I won't enter that debate now.
The purpose of this entry is to provide a link to a solar company website with solar PV sysetems with Enphase micro-inverters installed here in Ontario. Sentinel Solar has six projects listed on their website. [Oddly enough, when looking at each system some seem to be installed by different solar companies, not necessarily by Sentinel. Nothing like advertising for your competitors]. You will notice some things about these systems:
  • the Enphase micro-inverters provide panel-specific monitoring - interesting to see the variability between the panels
  • the web monitoring is nice if you are curious about instantaneous and historical power production
  • you can see the difference between the various systems all in one spot
  • you can't compare one system against another as some are roof mounted, others are trackers, and the panels are likely different at each location
  • individual panel monitoring can help you understand the power production, however if you see the inherent differences between the panels it is quite likely you won't be doing much about it. It might just drive you crazy wondering why
Keep in mind, we don't see the costs of the different systems. Monitoring and power generation is interesting, but installation and maintenance costs are also part of the equation!

Nov 2010 results, how much energy are the panels producing

It is very difficult to determine what size panels and inverter to get. One option is to slightly oversize your panel wattage output compared to your inverter capacity. For example, installing 20 panels of 235 kW gives you a theoretical maximum of 4.7kW output from the panels. Installing a 4 kW inverter means your panels are over-sized for the inverter by 18%. I have heard that solar installers often will "oversize" the panel array for the inverter by 10%-20%. The logic is that you can save a little money by buying a smaller inverter because the likelihood of the system frequently producing maximum power is low. Also, inverters are often most efficient when operating towards their top end of output. Therefore, installing an over powered inverter means it may be operating at less than its maximum efficiency - and that is an power conversion loss to you.
Another reason why panels will be over-sized is for people installing a 10 kW array. The microFIT program limits you to 10 kW of either panels or inverter, whichever is the lowest rated output. Therefore, the system would install 10% or more watts of panels of the inverter capacity - to maximize the amount of energy generation in the mornings, afternoons, and cloudy days. You pay a little more for the panels, but in the long run you make more power under suboptimal radiation periods. And the project would still qualify as a =<10 kW project for the microFIT rules.
My situation was a little different. At first I was going to have 20 235 W panels, however, I eventually had 20 245 W panels installed, and I had a 4 kW inverter. Instead of my panel array being over-sized by 18% it was now 23%. I had no reliable way to assess if I would have a significant power generation loss over the year with an inverter that could now be notably undersized. Additionally, when I ran the Fronius configuration tool [online version] my panel voltages were now going to exceed the inverter optimal ranges under certain temperature regimes. My solar installing company graciously switched my inverter to a 5 kW Fronius IG 5100. My inverter is now a little over-sized for my 4.9 kW system, but I am pleased that I'll not be losing power generation during peak radiation periods.
So... during a relatively cloudy, cool November, how much energy do my panels produce? I downloaded the entire month, except today's data [a very dark rainy day] and calculated the per panel 15 minute average power generation in watts.
Some stats:
  • there were 1103 15-minute measurement intervals from 1-29 Nov [will be higher in the summer when the sun is up longer]
  • the cloudy mornings, afternoons, and other very dark periods meant that quite often the average panel output was less than 21.5 W [that's less than 10% of the panel capacity]
  • maximum output was 215.5 W, there were only 7 15 minute periods where power was greater than 194 watts
  • maximum total output was 4311 W, this is somewhat low as higher values have been recorded in August and September
 I'll publish similar results for the forthcoming months.