Showing posts with label coefficients. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coefficients. Show all posts

02 April 2016

Production Update to March 2016

Time for me to post a new update of the production from my solar array. In October 2013 I installed some new equipment, including Tigo Energy optimisers [www.tigoenergy.com]. I was not anticipating a significant increase in the overall array efficiency because the array is not facing any shading. It should increase the output and efficiency during the winter when there is partial coverage due to snow and ice.
Table below shows the production to date as well as the efficiencies for each month.
Updated: 04/02/16









Years






Date Data 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Result
Jan Sum - Daily kWhr
170 256 243 216 281 210 1374

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
0.9 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.2
Feb Sum - Daily kWhr
275 323 214 197 333 312 1652

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
1.5 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.9 1.7 1.5
Mar Sum - Daily kWhr
561 569 499 577 663 483 3352

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
2.8 2.9 2.5 2.9 3.3 2.4 2.8
Apr Sum - Daily kWhr
493 626 574 615 656
2962

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
2.6 3.3 3.0 3.2 3.4
3.1
May Sum - Daily kWhr
534 758 768 699 745
3504

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
2.7 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.8
3.5
Jun Sum - Daily kWhr
707 715 633 757 687
3499

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
3.7 3.7 3.3 3.9 3.6
3.6
Jul Sum - Daily kWhr
769 762 693 735 821
3780

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
3.9 3.8 3.5 3.7 4.1
3.8
Aug Sum - Daily kWhr 164 658 720 711 694 693
3640

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW] 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.5
3.5
Sep Sum - Daily kWhr 438 528 600
626 625
2817

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW] 2.3 2.8 3.1
3.3 3.3
2.9
Oct Sum - Daily kWhr 450 391 338 79 381 455
2093

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW] 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.3
2.0
Nov Sum - Daily kWhr 355 316 286 296 177 334
1765

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW] 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.5 0.9 1.7
1.5
Dec Sum - Daily kWhr 78 220 144 119 169 148
877

Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW] 0.4 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7
0.7
Total Sum - Daily kWhr
1486 5623 6096 4828 5841 6439 1005 31317
Total Average - Efficiency [kWhr/kW]
1.8 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.8 1.7 2.5

You'll see that of course the efficiency is different for each month from winter to summer to winter again - there is much less sun energy coming in so the panels generate less. The same pattern for total energy output. The summation in the right column doesn't mean too much given that part way through October 2013 the equipment changed. The sum and averages at the bottom are interesting. Disregard 2013 again due to partial data and a change in the equipment. 
Comparing 2011 and 2012 with 2014 and 2015 we see the following:
  • lowest output was 2011 [range between 2014-2011 = 218 kWhr]
  • highest was 2015 [range between 2015-2012 = 343 kWhr]
  • average efficiency 2011-2012 = 2.5, post upgrade = 2.65]
These statistics, if anything, show that there is quite a lot of annual and intra-annual variability in energy production. There was 600 kWhr difference between 2014 and 2015, or about 10%. 

So? Was the equipment upgrades worth it? Let's look at more statistics.
Variables kWhr Dollars
Mean 15.90 $13.03
Mean post upgrade 15.50 $12.43
Per 1 kW 3.24 $2.66
Per 1 kW post upgrade 2.42 $1.94
Min 0.05 $0.04
Min post upgrade 0.08 $0.07
Max 35.44 $28.42
Max post upgrade 36.49 $29.26

Pre and post upgrade, the data show an underwhelming result despite an extra 1.5 kW of capacity:
  • mean kWhr was actually higher before the upgrade
  • efficiency was lower by 0.8 kWhr/kW installed post upgrade
  • maximum daily output on the best day pre and post upgrade increased from 35.4 to 36.5 kWhr
The maximum daily output and other values of course can vary by year, but really, the max daily output should be at least 1.5 kW x 3 hours = 4.5 kWhr. I'll state this because I think that over any given 2 year period, there will be at least one amazing, sunny, clear, long, cold day.

I shall investigate this much more indepth using RETScreen soon and share these results with you.

16 April 2013

PV Generation to Mid-April 2013

I'm posting my latest data updates here. The April 2013 is only to the 15th of the month hence the 268 kWhr. February, March, and even the first half of April are not so good for production, but then Jan-April 2012 were exceptionally beautiful conditions.
I also have posted immediately below my basic stats of kWhr and Dollars per day, averaged over the 2 3/4 year lifetime of the system. Overall my most interesting stats are 3.05 kWhr/kW/day and $2.44/kW/day. These numbers would be helpful for anyone to help estimate their expected revenues. Of course every system is different, mine is facing south east, etc. A more representative statistic will be from August 2013 when we will have the anniversary date. The 3.05 and $2.44 will increase a bit over the summer because we get most of our solar generation happening then, and the stats below don't include the 2013 summer data of course.

Variables kW Dollars


Mean 14.93 $11.98


Per 1 kW 3.05 $2.44


Min 0.05 $0.04


Max 35.13 $28.17














Sum - Daily kWhr Years



Date 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Result
Jan
170 256 243 668
Feb
275 323 214 811
Mar
561 569 499 1630
Apr
493 626 268 1387
May
534 758
1292
Jun
707 715
1422
Jul
769 762
1531
Aug 164 658 720
1542
Sep 438 528 600
1566
Oct 450 391 338
1179
Nov 355 316 286
958
Dec 78 220 144
442
Total Result 1486 5623 6096 1224 14428
as of: 2013-04-16



24 November 2012

Some Basic Parameters of the PV System to Date

There are some handy parameters that can be used to estimate the power or revenue generation of a PV system. Often people will take the kW of the system and multiply it by the expected parameter to get expected value such as kW hours per year or dollars per year. These numbers are relatively easy to calculate. Ideally people are using the most realistic values possible if they want to estimate their expected outcome.
An example is, how many kilowatt hours should I generate from my 5 kW system on my roof?
First, here are my parameters for our 4.9 kW DC system [5 kW string inverter]:
Variables kW Dollars
Mean [4.9 kW] 15.81 $12.68
Per [1 kW] 3.23 $2.59
Min [4.9 kW] 0.05 $0.04
Max [4.9 kW] 35.13 $28.17
In this case, applying my parameters to a hypothetical 5 kW DC system, we could estimate mean daily kW production over the year to be 5 kW * 3.23 kW per kW = 16.15 kW per day. Multiply that your FIT contract price and this would be your daily income averaged over the year. 
You can use the values above to estimate your highest and lowest income as $28.17 / 4.9 * your DC kW.
Oh, and you can see that you'll have some bad days too - $0.04 / 4.9 kW will give you $0.01/kW on dark snowy, snow-covered panel days. 

23 March 2012

Little Snow Means Better Solar Production in 2011-2012

Spring is already here but our 2011-2012 winter ended a long time ago. There has been very little snow - I didn't have to shovel much since Christmas. The sky seems to have been clearer too and this has enabled our solar array to generate more power than last winter. It means a lot too, financially. Last August was our 1 year anniversary and on a $30k investment after 10-year loan payments, we netted $460 - not a great return on investment so hopefully 2012 will be better. So far, so good. Here is our kWhr generated by month in Table 1.
Sum - Daily kWhr Years


Date 2010 2011 2012 Total Result
Jan
169.7 255.8 425.5
Feb
275.0 322.5 597.5
Mar
560.8
560.8
Apr
492.9
492.9
May
534.3
534.3
Jun
707.2
707.2
Jul
769.0
769.0
Aug 164.0 658.5
822.5
Sep 438.0 528.0
966.0
Oct 450.0 391.1
841.1
Nov 355.4 316.3
671.7
Dec 78.2 219.8
298.1
Total Result 1485.6 5622.7 578.4 7686.7
If I use Dec-Feb to define winter, then we yielded 523 kW in 2010-2011 and this year 798 kW. That is a 275 kW difference or $220.55 difference in revenue. We'll see what this March brings to be able to compare two full winters. December 2010 and 2011 were especially different because Dec '10 was dark, dreery, and frequent intermittent snow that accumulated on the panels and seldom fully melted off or slid off.
The system didn't get connected until 25 August, so ignoring that we can see that most months are better than the year before, other than Oct and Nov 2011. We had a "dark" fall, but otherwise, I see it is all going well.
As you may read in this blog, I focus on the numbers, kW, dollars, and cents of our solar system. I am interested in these results today as it shows that you can't use a single year to determine if production data. Or any coefficients either. In an earlier posting I calculated the typical coefficients people use to estimate the power generation for our first year. I look forward to calculating this year's coefficients, plus to calculate the values for the duration of the system - that way we'll get the general values to expect for a multi-year estimation of coefficients.
So far, so good.
Oh, a little note about how I analyse these data. I use OpenOffice Calc to store and analyse the data. I use the Data Pilot tool [Pivot Tables in Excel] to summarize the data very quickly and easily.